{"id":35175,"date":"2025-10-24T14:56:01","date_gmt":"2025-10-24T14:56:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/?p=35175"},"modified":"2025-10-24T14:57:19","modified_gmt":"2025-10-24T14:57:19","slug":"trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump’s IVF Policy Could Be Worse, But It’s Still Bad"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

By: Ryan T. Anderson, originally published October 17, 2025, FirstThings.com<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Trump administration\u2019s IVF policy unveiled on Thursday is perhaps the least bad that we could have hoped for. The details are still being promulgated, but, as White House officials explained it, there will be no IVF mandate or direct government subsidies for IVF. Those who feared something akin to the Obama contraception mandate or taxpayer funding of abortion can breathe a sigh of relief. There will be no direct religious liberty or conscience violations, nor implications for taxpayer funding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But least bad is still bad. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The entire thrust of the policy is to make something unethical (IVF) more widely practiced. Such a policy is itself unethical. So while Americans won\u2019t be required to violate their conscience, our public policy will promote IVF more now than ever before.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

None of this is necessarily to cast aspersions on those pushing for IVF. President Trump, in his remarks at the White House on Thursday, showed compassion for the many Americans who struggle with infertility, and he clearly has real affection for children. He wants to be a pro-baby, pro-family president. His motivations are good.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But there is a stark contrast between these motivations and the ethical challenges with IVF\u2014challenges that most Americans know little, if anything, about. And that contrast was on vivid display during the White House policy announcement. Sen. Katie Britt called President Trump the most pro-IVF president in history. An IVF industry representative praised the president for the new policy, showing crony capitalism is alive and well. RFK Jr. told President Trump that Trump \u201cwas doing God\u2019s work\u201d in promoting IVF. Falsehoods were repeated about the Alabama court ruling that initiated this most-recent wave of IVF frenzy<\/a>. And no attention at all was paid to the ethical concerns with IVF, or to the medical reality that IVF doesn\u2019t actually treat infertility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When a reporter asked President Trump what his response was to pro-lifers with concerns, he seemed unaware that there were concerns: \u201cI don\u2019t know about the views of that . . . I think this is very pro-life. You can\u2019t get more pro-life than this.\u201d But IVF as practiced today entails massive killing and freezing of embryonic human beings. IVF doesn\u2019t treat underlying causes of infertility and doesn\u2019t respect the dignity of the human person in his or her creation, where people should be begotten, not made. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Many couples experiencing infertility ache to start a family. Doctors don\u2019t always impress on them the human costs of IVF. For one birth, doctors might create ten to twenty embryos, transfer several of the \u201cmost promising,\u201d freeze the rest, and if more than one implants, abort the others. So the typical IVF cycle results in multiple dead and frozen embryos. And unlike in European nations, there are almost no laws in America regulating how many embryos can be created or destroyed, or how frozen embryonic human beings can be treated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To some, this casual disregard is no accident, because IVF itself treats children as products of technical manufacture. It thus fails to respect the equal dignity of human beings in their very origins. Children are to be welcomed as the fruit of an act of marital love. Relating to a child instead as a producer relates to a product is the seed of all the abuses of the IVF industry\u2014the casual creation and destruction of \u201cspares,\u201d the filtering out of \u201cdefectives,\u201d the selection for sex and other specs (such as eye or hair color), the commodification of (often poor) women\u2019s bodies as incubators. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The fundamental moral concerns about IVF are not sectarian. While today the Catholic Church most prominently teaches that IVF itself is wrong, the three most prominent moral thinkers who opposed IVF\u2019s introduction in the 1970s and \u201980s were non-Catholic: the University of Chicago\u2019s Leon Kass (Jewish), Princeton\u2019s Paul Ramsey (Methodist), and Oxford\u2019s Oliver O\u2019Donovan (Anglican). The arguments stand or fall on the merits, not the religious identity (or lack thereof) of those making them. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Alas, the White House event displayed no sensitivity to\u2014or even awareness of\u2014these concerns. But it wasn\u2019t an outlier. Most Americans are unaware of these concerns. Indeed, truth be told, most church-attending Christians are blissfully unaware\u2014because the Church has done such a poor job of teaching these truths. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Which makes the White House\u2019s concern to not burden the consciences of the Americans who do<\/em> oppose IVF all the more laudable. I personally met with many high-ranking White House officials to express these concerns, and I know I wasn\u2019t the only one. I appreciate that the president\u2019s team engaged widely throughout this policy process and not only heard but responded to at least some of the concerns expressed. That said, instead of making IVF more affordable and accessible, the Trump administration needs to take steps to address our current state of unregulated embryo fabricating, freezing, and destroying. Embryonic human beings deserve the law\u2019s protection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bulk of the Trump IVF policy entails two main features: lowering the prices on IVF and other fertility treatments by lowering the costs of key drugs through Most Favored Nation (MFN) pricing, and creating a new optional employer fertility insurance benefit. One aspect of this insurance benefit that was not highlighted during the Oval Office announcement but was explained to me by White House staff deserves mention: The new optional employer fertility insurance benefit is fully customizable, so that an employer could opt to offer a benefit only for ethical fertility treatments like restorative reproductive medicine. Indeed, restorative reproductive medicine is both ethically and medically superior to IVF<\/a>, as it actually addresses the root causes of infertility, potentially allowing couples to conceive naturally through marital love instead of via technical manipulation in a petri dish. As the White House rolls out the details about this optional employer-sponsored fertility benefit, I know I\u2019ll be looking into offering an ethical plan at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

All of which is to say that it could have been worse, and there are some real bright spots. But it\u2019s ultimately a misguided policy. It highlights the reality that there is a lot of work yet to be done for those of us who believe in sound reproductive ethics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ryan T. Anderson is president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center. His most recent book is <\/strong><\/em>“Tearing Us Apart: How Abortion Harms Everything and Solves Nothing.”<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Image: FirstThings.com\/archive\/article-Ryan-Anderson<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By: Ryan T. Anderson, originally published October 17, 2025, FirstThings.com The Trump administration\u2019s IVF policy unveiled on Thursday is perhaps the least bad that we could have hoped for. The details are still being promulgated, but, as White House officials explained it, there will be no IVF mandate or direct government subsidies for IVF. Those…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":35176,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35175","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\nTrump's IVF Policy Could Be Worse, But It's Still Bad - Cincinnati Right to Life<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Trump's IVF Policy Could Be Worse, But It's Still Bad - Cincinnati Right to Life\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By: Ryan T. Anderson, originally published October 17, 2025, FirstThings.com The Trump administration\u2019s IVF policy unveiled on Thursday is perhaps the least bad that we could have hoped for. The details are still being promulgated, but, as White House officials explained it, there will be no IVF mandate or direct government subsidies for IVF. Those…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Cincinnati Right to Life\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-24T14:56:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-24T14:57:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/trump-IVF-policy-sad.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Melanie Wade\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Melanie Wade\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/\",\"name\":\"Trump's IVF Policy Could Be Worse, But It's Still Bad - Cincinnati Right to Life\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/trump-IVF-policy-sad.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-24T14:56:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-24T14:57:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/trump-IVF-policy-sad.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/trump-IVF-policy-sad.png\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":600},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Trump’s IVF Policy Could Be Worse, But It’s Still Bad\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/\",\"name\":\"Cincinnati Right to Life\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789\",\"name\":\"Melanie Wade\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Melanie Wade\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/author\/mwade\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Trump's IVF Policy Could Be Worse, But It's Still Bad - Cincinnati Right to Life","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Trump's IVF Policy Could Be Worse, But It's Still Bad - Cincinnati Right to Life","og_description":"By: Ryan T. Anderson, originally published October 17, 2025, FirstThings.com The Trump administration\u2019s IVF policy unveiled on Thursday is perhaps the least bad that we could have hoped for. The details are still being promulgated, but, as White House officials explained it, there will be no IVF mandate or direct government subsidies for IVF. Those…","og_url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/","og_site_name":"Cincinnati Right to Life","article_published_time":"2025-10-24T14:56:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-24T14:57:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":600,"url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/trump-IVF-policy-sad.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Melanie Wade","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Melanie Wade","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/","url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/","name":"Trump's IVF Policy Could Be Worse, But It's Still Bad - Cincinnati Right to Life","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/trump-IVF-policy-sad.png","datePublished":"2025-10-24T14:56:01+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-24T14:57:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/trump-IVF-policy-sad.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/trump-IVF-policy-sad.png","width":1200,"height":600},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/trumps-ivf-policy-could-be-worse-but-its-still-bad\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Trump’s IVF Policy Could Be Worse, But It’s Still Bad"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/","name":"Cincinnati Right to Life","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789","name":"Melanie Wade","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Melanie Wade"},"url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/author\/mwade\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35175","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35175"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35175\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35178,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35175\/revisions\/35178"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35176"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35175"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35175"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}