{"id":34804,"date":"2025-09-05T16:41:58","date_gmt":"2025-09-05T16:41:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/?p=34804"},"modified":"2025-09-05T16:43:42","modified_gmt":"2025-09-05T16:43:42","slug":"texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/","title":{"rendered":"Texas Lawmakers Back Citizen Lawsuits to Stop Mail-Order Abortion Pills"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p style=\"font-size:18px\"><strong><em>By:  J. David Goodman, originally published <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/08\/28\/us\/politics\/texas-house-abortion-bill.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">August 28, 2025, The New York Times<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Lawmakers in Texas moved decisively on Thursday to curtail the distribution of mail-order abortion medications from states like New York and California, allowing nearly anyone to sue doctors, distributors and manufacturers anywhere in the country and collect cash awards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Supporters hope and opponents fear the legislation, nearing final passage in Texas, will serve as a model for other states to limit medication abortion by promoting a rash of lawsuits against medical providers, pharmaceutical companies and companies such as FedEx or UPS that may ship the drugs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">If the legislation works as hoped, abortion opponents say, the availability of medication abortion could become more limited, even in states where abortion remains legal, because manufacturers and delivery companies could be expected to limit distribution in Texas to avoid legal liability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">\u201cThis is the strongest and the most legally dynamic attempt that our movement has made yet,\u201d said John Seago, the president of Texas Right to Life. While the legislation is focused on Texas, he added, \u201chopefully this will lead to a wider protection.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Texas\u2019s effort is part of a broader strategy by abortion foes to target the rising popularity of medication abortion and to expand limits on the procedure into states that ostensibly protect abortion rights. President Trump\u2019s budget and policy law, passed by Congress this summer,&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/07\/02\/us\/politics\/planned-parenthood-abortions-senate-medicaid-funding.html\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">imposed a one-year ban<\/a>&nbsp;on state Medicaid payments to any health-care nonprofit that offers abortions and received more than $800,000 in federal funding in 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">A&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/08\/25\/us\/politics\/maine-judge-abortion-funding-blocked.html\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">federal judge in Maine declined<\/a>&nbsp;on Monday to block the government from stripping Medicaid funding from one of Maine\u2019s largest abortion providers, finding that to do so would override \u201cthe will of the people as expressed by Congress.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Proponents of the Texas legislation also hoped it would undermine \u201cshield laws\u201d in Democrat-led states that protect abortion providers from liability. The conflict between different states\u2019 handling of abortion-related lawsuits could ultimately lead to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">\u201cTexas is sort of the tip of the spear,\u201d said Marc Hearron, the associate director of litigation at the Center for Reproductive Rights, which provides legal support to abortion providers. \u201cIt\u2019s setting up a clash.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Anti-abortion activists and many conservatives have been upset that the number of abortions nationwide has not declined since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 and a raft of conservative states banned the procedure. Studies have found that&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/03\/25\/health\/abortion-pills.html\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">a rise in abortions using prescription pills<\/a>, mifepristone and misoprostol, often prescribed and mailed from states where abortion is legal to those where it is not, is a key reason.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">\u201cWe are responding to a new trend that has popped up on the other side,\u201d Mr. Seago said. \u201cMy hope is that the penalty is so high and that the standing is so wide \u2014 anybody can bring these lawsuits \u2014 that it will deter doctors in California and in New York from doing business in Texas.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Other Republican-led states have looked for ways to curb the interstate mailing of abortion medication. In Louisiana, lawmakers approved a measure last month&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/louisiana-abortion-pills-doctors-liability-5c2c4c4bf81f30da473cc9a6b68374fa\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">allowing for suits against out-of-state doctors<\/a>&nbsp;who provide abortion medications. The Tennessee legislature considered a similar bill this year, but it failed to pass.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">The Texas measure is the legislature\u2019s second attempt to try to curb mail-order abortion pills, after failing to pass similar legislation during its regular session in the spring. Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican and an abortion opponent, then called for the legislature to try again during a pair of special sessions this summer in which most of the attention focused on a Republican push for redistricting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">It was already illegal to provide abortion medication in Texas under the state\u2019s near-total ban, which provides for serious criminal and civil penalties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">The new Texas legislation, which was approved 82-to-48, goes farther. It allows ordinary people unconnected to a pregnant woman to sue manufacturers, and people who provide or send medications that induce abortions to Texans, or intend to do so \u2014 and to collect a minimum of $100,000 in damages. Women who take such medications to end their pregnancies could not be sued under the legislation. A suit can be brought even if no abortion has taken place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">\u201cAn abortion does not have to occur for there to potentially be enforcement?\u201d State Representative Erin Zwiener, a Democrat from San Marcos, asked during debate on Thursday.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">\u201cCorrect,\u201d said State Representative Jeff Leach, a Dallas-area Republican who sponsored the bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Ms. Zwiener presented a hypothetical situation in which the parent of a pregnant daughter called a clinic outside of Texas and inquired about mail-order abortion pills. \u201cThat person could potentially be liable under this type of lawsuit?\u201d she asked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">\u201cCorrect,\u201d Mr. Leach said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Similar legislation already passed the State Senate. With passage in the House, it now needs to be signed off on again by the Senate before heading to Gov. Greg Abbott\u2019s desk for his expected signature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">The bill initially divided anti-abortion activists. Some were concerned that it would invite \u201cbounty hunters\u201d to file suits aimed at \u201cprofiting from the death of an unborn child to whom they are entirely unconnected,\u201d said Joe Pojman, the executive director of the Texas Alliance for Life, in testimony at a House hearing on Friday.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">But Mr. Pojman\u2019s group backed the final House version of the legislation after new language was inserted saying that unrelated plaintiffs would only be able to keep $10,000 \u2014 with the remaining $90,000 going to a charity of the plaintiff\u2019s choice, as long as the person filing the lawsuit did not have a direct connection or a financial stake in it. The revised bill also does not allow suits to be brought by domestic abusers or by men who committed sexual assault resulting in a pregnancy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">\u201cWe are united,\u201d Amy O\u2019Donnell, a spokeswoman for Texas Alliance for Life, said of the anti-abortion advocacy groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">The bill was modeled on legislation approved in 2021 that effectively prohibited most abortions in Texas even before the Supreme Court allowed for a total ban. Both laws were designed to create a deterrent by promoting civil lawsuits, though few such suits were actually filed under the 2021 law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">The new bill attempts to defeat shield laws in more than a dozen states, including New York, Massachusetts, Colorado and California, in part by declaring that those shield laws could not be used as a defense against suits brought under the Texas law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">But even if a suit is successful in Texas, courts in shield-law states would not be compelled by the new legislation to enforce the judgment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">\u201cIt\u2019s pushing up against the limits of how much a state can control,\u201d said Mr. Hearron of the Center for Reproductive rights. \u201cEach state can have its own laws, but throughout our history, we have been able to travel across the country, send things across the country.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Republicans and anti-abortion activists in Texas have sought to challenge the shield laws in other ways. A Texas man&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.texastribune.org\/2025\/07\/23\/texas-california-abortion-pill-shield-law-lawsuit\/\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">sued a California doctor<\/a>&nbsp;last month, and the Texas attorney general has been pursuing legal action against a New York doctor,&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/02\/13\/health\/texas-new-york-abortion-pills-lawsuit.html\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Margaret Daley Carpenter<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">This year, a Texas judge ruled&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/02\/13\/health\/texas-new-york-abortion-pills-lawsuit.html\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">against Dr. Carpenter,<\/a>&nbsp;ordering her to pay a $100,000 penalty and to stop sending abortion pills to patients in Texas. The doctor and her lawyers have not responded to the Texas suit, relying on the protections of New York laws.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Mr. Leach, the state representative, said that he expected his legislation to be challenged in court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:18px\"><strong><em>J. David Goodman is the Houston bureau chief for The Times, reporting on Texas and Oklahoma.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:18px\"><strong><em>Image:  Sergio Flores\/Reuters &#8211; New York Times.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By: J. David Goodman, originally published August 28, 2025, The New York Times Lawmakers in Texas moved decisively on Thursday to curtail the distribution of mail-order abortion medications from states like New York and California, allowing nearly anyone to sue doctors, distributors and manufacturers anywhere in the country and collect cash awards. Supporters hope and&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":34805,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v24.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Texas Lawmakers Back Citizen Lawsuits to Stop Mail-Order Abortion Pills - Cincinnati Right to Life<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Texas Lawmakers Back Citizen Lawsuits to Stop Mail-Order Abortion Pills - Cincinnati Right to Life\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By: J. David Goodman, originally published August 28, 2025, The New York Times Lawmakers in Texas moved decisively on Thursday to curtail the distribution of mail-order abortion medications from states like New York and California, allowing nearly anyone to sue doctors, distributors and manufacturers anywhere in the country and collect cash awards. Supporters hope and&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Cincinnati Right to Life\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-05T16:41:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-05T16:43:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Texas-Lawmakers-back-citizens.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Melanie Wade\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Melanie Wade\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/\",\"name\":\"Texas Lawmakers Back Citizen Lawsuits to Stop Mail-Order Abortion Pills - Cincinnati Right to Life\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Texas-Lawmakers-back-citizens.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-05T16:41:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-05T16:43:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Texas-Lawmakers-back-citizens.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Texas-Lawmakers-back-citizens.png\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":600},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Texas Lawmakers Back Citizen Lawsuits to Stop Mail-Order Abortion Pills\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/\",\"name\":\"Cincinnati Right to Life\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789\",\"name\":\"Melanie Wade\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Melanie Wade\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/author\/mwade\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Texas Lawmakers Back Citizen Lawsuits to Stop Mail-Order Abortion Pills - Cincinnati Right to Life","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Texas Lawmakers Back Citizen Lawsuits to Stop Mail-Order Abortion Pills - Cincinnati Right to Life","og_description":"By: J. David Goodman, originally published August 28, 2025, The New York Times Lawmakers in Texas moved decisively on Thursday to curtail the distribution of mail-order abortion medications from states like New York and California, allowing nearly anyone to sue doctors, distributors and manufacturers anywhere in the country and collect cash awards. Supporters hope and&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/","og_site_name":"Cincinnati Right to Life","article_published_time":"2025-09-05T16:41:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-05T16:43:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":600,"url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Texas-Lawmakers-back-citizens.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Melanie Wade","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Melanie Wade","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/","url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/","name":"Texas Lawmakers Back Citizen Lawsuits to Stop Mail-Order Abortion Pills - Cincinnati Right to Life","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Texas-Lawmakers-back-citizens.png","datePublished":"2025-09-05T16:41:58+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-05T16:43:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Texas-Lawmakers-back-citizens.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Texas-Lawmakers-back-citizens.png","width":1200,"height":600},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/texas-lawmakers-back-citizen-lawsuits-to-stop-mail-order-abortion-pills\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Texas Lawmakers Back Citizen Lawsuits to Stop Mail-Order Abortion Pills"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/","name":"Cincinnati Right to Life","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789","name":"Melanie Wade","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Melanie Wade"},"url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/author\/mwade\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34804","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34804"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34804\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34808,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34804\/revisions\/34808"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/34805"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34804"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34804"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34804"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}