{"id":32791,"date":"2024-11-08T22:51:00","date_gmt":"2024-11-08T22:51:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/?p=32791"},"modified":"2024-11-08T22:51:01","modified_gmt":"2024-11-08T22:51:01","slug":"pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/","title":{"rendered":"Pro-Life Laws Aren&#8217;t to Blame for Increased Infant Mortality"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p style=\"font-size:18px\"><strong><em>By:  Ingrid Skop, originally published <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/2024\/11\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">November 8, 2024, National Review<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:28px\"><strong>Demonizing pro-life protections isn&#8217;t the solution to the heartbreaking problem of infant mortality and diverts efforts from finding real solutions.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">After\u00a0a\u00a0<em>JAMA Pediatrics<\/em>\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamapediatrics\/article-abstract\/2825201?resultClick=3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">research letter<\/a>\u00a0identified notable national increases in infant mortality following the\u00a0<em>Dobbs<\/em>\u00a0decision, pro-abortion media were quick to blame pro-life laws. The reaction mirrored the response to a\u00a0<em>JAMA Pediatrics<\/em>\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamapediatrics\/article-abstract\/2819785\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">article<\/a>\u00a0from June reporting that infant deaths rose 12.7 percent above expectation in Texas following the implementation of its Heartbeat Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">These knee-jerk reactions were rooted in uncritical analyses that serve only to push the pro-abortion lobby\u2019s talking points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Infant mortality, defined as death in the first year of birth, has been unacceptably high in the U.S. for many decades. The U.S. consistently ranks near the bottom of developed countries on this metric. The data provided in these studies, however, do nothing to justify laying blame on pro-life laws.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">There are two reasons for this. First, although every infant death is a tragedy, focusing on changes in infant-mortality rates, rather than changes in absolute numbers, paints a far less dire picture than the media would have us believe \u2014 especially when comparing these rates with the sharp increases in infant mortality in other, pro-abortion states.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Second, much of the increase in infant mortality can be attributed to more infants being born with life-limiting conditions who otherwise would have been killed before birth by abortion. Killing these babies before they have a chance to be born and counted in the statistics is hardly a compelling, or moral, way to address the issue of infant mortality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Attacking pro-life laws and promoting unlimited, all-trimester abortion won\u2019t solve the tragedy of infant mortality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Upon more closely examining the data in&nbsp;<em>JAMA<\/em>\u2019s Texas article, my colleague Michael New&nbsp;<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/corner\/mainstream-media-mislead-on-a-texas-infant-mortality-study\/\">observed<\/a>&nbsp;that the infant-mortality rate in 2022 was 5.75 infant deaths per 1,000 births. This is very similar to previous rates in Texas from 2007 to 2020 (prior to an elevation related to Covid-19) and only about three percentage points higher than the U.S. average that year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">In part because of the Heartbeat Act, Texas experienced a baby boom in 2022 compared with the rest of the country. Sixteen thousand more children were born in the state that year than in 2021. This of course helps to explain the increase in the absolute number of infant deaths (as the study\u2019s authors themselves admit). Examining the infant-mortality&nbsp;<em>rate<\/em>&nbsp;rather than the absolute number of deaths, however, takes these additional births into account and produces a more accurate measurement of \u201cchange\u201d that puts these numbers in perspective. The Texas infant-mortality rate&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/nchs\/pressroom\/sosmap\/infant_mortality_rates\/infant_mortality.htm\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">changed<\/a>&nbsp;minimally, from 5.31 in 2021 to 5.75 in 2022, an 8.3 percent increase.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Two additional data points are notable in showing the likely political motivation of singling out Texas for criticism. First, the CDC\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/nchs\/pressroom\/sosmap\/infant_mortality_rates\/infant_mortality.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">reports<\/a>\u00a0that more than half of the states (28) had higher infant-mortality rates than Texas in 2022. Many of these states have permissive abortion laws. The same data show that a number of states with permissive abortion laws, such as Hawaii, New Mexico, and Wisconsin,\u00a0<em>also\u00a0<\/em>experienced increases in infant-mortality rates between 2021 and 2022. Hawaii experienced a 24 percent increase; New Mexico a 23 percent increase; and Wisconsin an 8.2 percent increase (roughly equivalent to Texas\u2019s increase).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Both studies note that the increase in infant mortality was particularly high because of infant deaths from life-limiting conditions (birth defects and genetic disorders). But the presence of pro-life laws does not cause unborn children to develop life-limiting conditions, which account for about&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/nchs\/data\/nvsr\/nvsr73\/nvsr73-05.pdf\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">20 percent<\/a>&nbsp;of all infant mortality. Sadly, prior to the implementation of pro-life laws after&nbsp;<em>Dobbs<\/em>, obstetricians often promoted abortion as the preferred or only option to grieving families who received a severe prenatal diagnoses. Many families&nbsp;felt&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/24311520\/\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">pressured to abort<\/a>&nbsp;rather than patiently explore a full spectrum of options honoring the life and dignity of the child.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">A reflexive recommendation of abortion in this circumstance fails to offer the option of perinatal palliative care, an approach that offers comfort and support to a family as they navigate the impending death of a beloved family member.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.acog.org\/clinical\/clinical-guidance\/committee-opinion\/articles\/2019\/09\/perinatal-palliative-care\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Perinatal palliative care<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/abstract\/10.1055\/s-0041-1740251\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">focuses<\/a>\u00a0on easing the suffering of the child and honoring the values of the family, allowing them to decide in advance the desired interventions for their child.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Continuing the pregnancy also allows more opportunities to find meaning in the child\u2019s tragically shortened life and may improve the grieving process, even if the child does not survive birth. These opportunities include holding and showing love to the baby, creating mementos and photographs, and potentially allowing participation in research as well as in tissue or organ donation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Physicians cannot predict the degree of impairment a child with a particular diagnosis will suffer. Nor do they know how a family will respond to caring for an affected child. In fact, it has been&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/medical-devices\/safety-communications\/genetic-non-invasive-prenatal-screening-tests-may-have-false-results-fda-safety-communication\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">widely documented<\/a>&nbsp;that antenatal screening tests for fetal malformations are often&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2022\/01\/01\/upshot\/pregnancy-birth-genetic-testing.html\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">wrong<\/a>. Advances in medical science also now offer in utero surgery to repair or ameliorate some serious conditions diagnosed prenatally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Additionally, the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/36882305\/\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">survival<\/a>&nbsp;of many children with diagnoses once thought \u201cincompatible with life\u201d has now been occasionally documented to span&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/lozierinstitute.org\/five-facts-about-life-limiting-fetal-conditions\/\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">over a decade<\/a>. Ninety-seven percent of parents of children with Trisomy 13 or 18&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/22826570\/\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">described<\/a>&nbsp;their child as happy and felt that the child enriched the family.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Aborting an unborn child with a life-limiting condition merely kills him or her&nbsp;<em>before<\/em>&nbsp;birth, meaning these deaths would not be recorded as&nbsp;infant-mortality&nbsp;statistics. The sinister implication of articles that bemoan the missed opportunity to abruptly end life soon after a challenging diagnosis is that babies\u2019 deaths only matter once they are born.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Demonizing pro-life protections isn\u2019t the solution to the heartbreaking problem of infant mortality and diverts efforts from finding real solutions. Rather, to make progress on this issue, we should investigate the underlying causes of infant mortality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"font-size:18px\"><strong><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/author\/ingrid-skop\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Ingrid Skop<\/a>\u00a0is vice president and director of medical affairs for Charlotte Lozier Institute.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By: Ingrid Skop, originally published November 8, 2024, National Review Demonizing pro-life protections isn&#8217;t the solution to the heartbreaking problem of infant mortality and diverts efforts from finding real solutions. After\u00a0a\u00a0JAMA Pediatrics\u00a0research letter\u00a0identified notable national increases in infant mortality following the\u00a0Dobbs\u00a0decision, pro-abortion media were quick to blame pro-life laws. The reaction mirrored the response to&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":32792,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32791","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v24.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Pro-Life Laws Aren&#039;t to Blame for Increased Infant Mortality - Cincinnati Right to Life<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pro-Life Laws Aren&#039;t to Blame for Increased Infant Mortality - Cincinnati Right to Life\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By: Ingrid Skop, originally published November 8, 2024, National Review Demonizing pro-life protections isn&#8217;t the solution to the heartbreaking problem of infant mortality and diverts efforts from finding real solutions. After\u00a0a\u00a0JAMA Pediatrics\u00a0research letter\u00a0identified notable national increases in infant mortality following the\u00a0Dobbs\u00a0decision, pro-abortion media were quick to blame pro-life laws. The reaction mirrored the response to&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Cincinnati Right to Life\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-11-08T22:51:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-11-08T22:51:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ProlifeLaws-dont-cause-infant-mortality.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1356\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"673\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Melanie Wade\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Melanie Wade\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/\",\"name\":\"Pro-Life Laws Aren't to Blame for Increased Infant Mortality - Cincinnati Right to Life\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ProlifeLaws-dont-cause-infant-mortality.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-08T22:51:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-08T22:51:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ProlifeLaws-dont-cause-infant-mortality.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ProlifeLaws-dont-cause-infant-mortality.jpg\",\"width\":1356,\"height\":673},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pro-Life Laws Aren&#8217;t to Blame for Increased Infant Mortality\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/\",\"name\":\"Cincinnati Right to Life\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789\",\"name\":\"Melanie Wade\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Melanie Wade\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/author\/mwade\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pro-Life Laws Aren't to Blame for Increased Infant Mortality - Cincinnati Right to Life","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pro-Life Laws Aren't to Blame for Increased Infant Mortality - Cincinnati Right to Life","og_description":"By: Ingrid Skop, originally published November 8, 2024, National Review Demonizing pro-life protections isn&#8217;t the solution to the heartbreaking problem of infant mortality and diverts efforts from finding real solutions. After\u00a0a\u00a0JAMA Pediatrics\u00a0research letter\u00a0identified notable national increases in infant mortality following the\u00a0Dobbs\u00a0decision, pro-abortion media were quick to blame pro-life laws. The reaction mirrored the response to&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/","og_site_name":"Cincinnati Right to Life","article_published_time":"2024-11-08T22:51:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-11-08T22:51:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1356,"height":673,"url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ProlifeLaws-dont-cause-infant-mortality.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Melanie Wade","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Melanie Wade","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/","url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/","name":"Pro-Life Laws Aren't to Blame for Increased Infant Mortality - Cincinnati Right to Life","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ProlifeLaws-dont-cause-infant-mortality.jpg","datePublished":"2024-11-08T22:51:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-08T22:51:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ProlifeLaws-dont-cause-infant-mortality.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ProlifeLaws-dont-cause-infant-mortality.jpg","width":1356,"height":673},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/pro-life-laws-arent-to-blame-for-increased-infant-mortality\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pro-Life Laws Aren&#8217;t to Blame for Increased Infant Mortality"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/","name":"Cincinnati Right to Life","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789","name":"Melanie Wade","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Melanie Wade"},"url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/author\/mwade\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32791","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32791"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32791\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32793,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32791\/revisions\/32793"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32792"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32791"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32791"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32791"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}