{"id":29389,"date":"2023-09-10T17:10:29","date_gmt":"2023-09-10T17:10:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/?p=29389"},"modified":"2024-03-01T18:26:55","modified_gmt":"2024-03-01T18:26:55","slug":"few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/","title":{"rendered":"Few Legislative Proposals Do More to Decimate Women’s, Children’s and Parents’ Rights than the Constitutional Amendment on Ohio’s November Ballot"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

By: Lisa Murtha<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Proponents of amending the Ohio constitution this November have framed it as a simple \u201creproductive rights\u201d issue. But the proposed amendment\u2019s official name – the \u201cRight to Make Reproductive Decisions Including <\/strong>Abortion Initiative\u201d – <\/s>reveals the framers\u2019 clear attempt at legislative sleight of hand. (emphasis added)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The moment the amendment\u2019s language was officially released, even a Washington Post<\/em> columnist became concerned. Kathleen Parker won a Pulitzer in 2010 and is identified on her website as the most widely syndicated columnist in America. Though she is admittedly \u201cpro-life,\u201d she does not fit neatly into any political category and writes for one of the most openly left-leaning newspapers in the world. Her March 31 column, \u201cIn Post Roe America, Weird Changes Might Be Coming To Abortion Law<\/a>,\u201d sounds off massive alarm bells and describes in detail facets of this proposed amendment that should terrify parents and women alike, both statewide and across the nation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Parker starts the piece by emphatically noting the proposed Ohio amendment would \u201cslyly open the door to much more\u201d than just abortion, pointing to both included and excluded language.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For starters, she goes on to note, \u201cmy antennae shot up when I saw the abortion amendment doesn\u2019t mention women,\u201d but rather \u201cpregnant patients.\u201d Though seemingly an innocent nod to acceptance of all sexual identities, the verbiage, in legal terms \u2013 which are crucial for all Ohioans of voting age to understand right now \u2013 is \u201can unsubtle hint,\u201d says Parker, that the amendment isn\u2019t wholly intended to protect a woman\u2019s right to choose<\/em>.<\/strong>\u201d (emphasis added)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In other words, the language diverts readers by appealing to their emotions, while \u2013 in reality – it could very easily be weaponized by \u201cprotect[ing] access to all sorts of medical interventions, including sex-change surgery or sterilization\u2026\u201d  but not just for consenting adults.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In perhaps the most disturbing form of what Parker calls \u201cwordplay,\u201d age is never mentioned in the proposed amendment, meaning that \u201cchildren could have unfettered access to surgical procedures<\/strong>, including abortion, without parental interference,\u201d says Parker.  (emphasis added).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For those who think this is only about abortion, consider that transgender surgeries skyrocketed fourfold between 2000 and 2014<\/a> and tripled again between 2016 and 2019 as this MSN article notes.<\/a> Gender surgeries are also a growing source of revenue for places like Planned Parenthood<\/a> and Cincinnati Children\u2019s Hospital, which has an entire department dedicated to it<\/a> that was initially funded by a grant from the founders of sex toy company Pure Romance<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another strong linguistic warning flag is the legislation\u2019s use of the word \u201cindividual\u201d \u2013 again, a seemingly virtuous nod to acceptance which is instead a legal poison pill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As noted by Civil Rights and Constitutional Law attorney and President of Greater Cincinnati Right to Life, Rachel Citak, in a court of law, such purposefully vague language can and will give people of all ages \u2013 including children<\/em> of all ages – the ability to make life-altering decisions regarding anything to do with \u201creproductive health\u201d and to cut their parents 100% out of those same decisions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Citak also notes that those who think the state replacing parents couldn\u2019t happen in Ohio may not know about the 2018 Cincinnati case where it already did<\/a>. Hamilton County took custody of a Northwest Local student away from the biological parents in order to allow the minor access to life-altering puberty blockers and surgeries from Cincinnati Children\u2019s Hospital (CCHMC). The parents had unknowingly taken their child to CCHMC for treatment of psychiatry and depression. The staff there quickly rendered a diagnosis of gender dysphoria, recommending everything from psychotherapy to hormone therapy to \u201csurgical intervention to change sex characteristics.\u201d In her trial notes, Judge Sylvia Sieve Hendon expressed concern that 100% of the patients who are referred to CCHMC\u2019s transgender program director are deemed \u201cappropriate candidates for gender treatment.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additional verbiage in the amendment indicates that abortion at all stages of pregnancy \u2013 even up until birth \u2013 would become fully legal in Ohio if the amendment passes. Parker fails to note that the amendment says the procedure may <\/em>be prohibited after fetal viability. \u201cThe problem, Citak points out, is that \u201cit doesn\u2019t say \u2018shall,\u2019 it says \u2018may.\u2019 In no case is [abortion] allowed to be prohibited\u2014even after viability\u2014 if the abortionist says so. That means all 9 months.\u201d Citak also explains that \u201cthe amendment creates a conflict of interest, granting the \u201ctreating physician\u201d authority over deciding whether an abortion is advisable, which leaves parents out of the process and gives the abortionist\u2014who profits from the procedure\u2014ultimate authority.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those who don\u2019t have children but are champions of women\u2019s health and rights should also be concerned at the wording of the amendment. \u201cWhat\u2019s also clear is that these abortion \u2018protections\u2019 would remove regulations that are now in place,\u201d writes Parker, \u201csuch as requirements that abortion clinics meet hospital standards for patient care. Or that a hospital be nearby.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Women have been told for decades that, without Roe v. Wade<\/em>, they will be forced to have \u201ccoat hanger abortions in back alleys.\u201d Ironically, this amendment actually works to undo even the most basic medical safeguards and protections currently in place for women, making the modern-day equivalent of \u201cback-alley coat hanger\u201d abortions all but guaranteed. Citak notes that \u201cthis includes even the most basic guarantees that the person performing the abortion is a physician, and further that this physician has access and admitting privileges to a nearby hospital for emergency care.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Consider the 2021 case of a 20-year-old Cleveland woman<\/a> who required emergency treatment after a perforated uterus during an abortion at Cleveland\u2019s Preterm Abortion Clinic. Or the case of Lakisha Wilson, another patient at the same facility who died during her abortion, on the operating table, from cardiac arrest. Ultimately, Citak believes, pro-abortion and transgender-surgery proponents will try to use the new amendment to argue that \u201cthe [state\u2019s current] health & safety regulations get in the way of the alleged \u2018health\u2019 of the woman or child.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

More wording in the amendment \u2013 \u201cThe State shall not, directly or indirectly, burden, penalize, prohibit, interfere with, or discriminate against either an individual\u2019s voluntary exercise of this right (to abortion, fertility treatment, continuing one\u2019s own pregnancy, miscarriage care and abortion) or a person or entity that assists an individual exercising this right.\u201d \u2014<\/em> will also legally protect pedophiles, rapists and human traffickers alike. \u201cThis amendment will shield those individuals,\u201d says Citak, \u201cbecause, again, of this \u2018shall not\u2019 language forbidding any \u2018interference.\u2019 Whether the victim is a victim of human trafficking or abuse, woman or child \u2013 this amendment protects abusers, pimps and traffickers while penalizing parents.\u201d  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Regarding rape, Parker\u2019s article cites an Ohio case – a soccer coach impregnated a 14-year-old and took her for an abortion without her parents\u2019 knowledge – as a \u201ccautionary tale;\u201d Cincinnati attorney Brian Hurley represented that young woman and her family and resolved, to their satisfaction, his clients\u2019 claims against Planned Parenthood, which performed an abortion on the minor without her parent\u2019s\u2019 knowledge or consent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the November Amendment passes, notes Hurley, Ohioans should look north to Michigan, which enshrined the right to abortion in its constitution in 2022, to see what will happen next. \u201cI have no doubt that in Michigan plans were immediately implemented to have that state\u2019s parental consent statute found to violate its constitution,\u201d says Hurley. Citak also adds that abortion proponents in Michigan have already <\/em>initiated demands and efforts to obliterate parental consent, as detailed by Michigan Advance<\/a>. \u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here in Ohio, Hurley notes, \u201cIf the proposed amendment passes, within a very short period of time a lawsuit will be filed challenging Ohio\u2019s parental consent statute\u201d- essentially by claiming that statute now interferes with the right to abortion under the newly amended state constitution. Ultimately, he says, \u201cthe amendment will also be used to attempt to eliminate Ohio\u2019s abortion informed consent statute and the duty of abortion providers to notify law enforcement of sexual abusers of girls and women who are pressured or coerced by their abusers to have an abortion.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It will also protect those adults \u2013 doctors and activists alike \u2013 who convince children to have irreversible, life-altering \u201csex change\u201d surgeries, or take drugs with similar effects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

19-year-old \u201c<\/strong>gender-change\u201d surgery survivor Chloe Cole explained the draw of such surgeries in particular at a recent talk in Norwood, Ohio, where she described her former self \u2013 a nine-year-old who went through puberty way too early and was terrified of the responsibilities and burdens that came with being a woman, while in so many ways she was still a child. In fact, many children are initially fearful of the bodily and emotional transformations that occur as they morph into teens and then adults; this does not mean, Cole and many others who have been permanently scarred by these surgeries argue, that they should be subjected to life altering and often experimental surgeries whose irreversible consequences they cannot possibly comprehend.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cChildren are having their right to reproduce taken away from them with steroids and drugs that are used to convert healthy girls and boys into just a mimicry of the opposite sex,\u201d said Cole. \u201cWhere are their reproductive rights? Mine were lost when I was 13. You and I are the only things standing between this attack on children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cYou have a duty to finish this fight with me.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By: Lisa Murtha Proponents of amending the Ohio constitution this November have framed it as a simple \u201creproductive rights\u201d issue. But the proposed amendment\u2019s official name – the \u201cRight to Make Reproductive Decisions Including Abortion Initiative\u201d – reveals the framers\u2019 clear attempt at legislative sleight of hand. (emphasis added) The moment the amendment\u2019s language was…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":29390,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29389","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\nFew Legislative Proposals Do More to Decimate Women's, Children's and Parents' Rights than the Constitutional Amendment on Ohio's November Ballot - Cincinnati Right to Life<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Few Legislative Proposals Do More to Decimate Women's, Children's and Parents' Rights than the Constitutional Amendment on Ohio's November Ballot - Cincinnati Right to Life\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By: Lisa Murtha Proponents of amending the Ohio constitution this November have framed it as a simple \u201creproductive rights\u201d issue. But the proposed amendment\u2019s official name – the \u201cRight to Make Reproductive Decisions Including Abortion Initiative\u201d – reveals the framers\u2019 clear attempt at legislative sleight of hand. (emphasis added) The moment the amendment\u2019s language was…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Cincinnati Right to Life\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-10T17:10:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-01T18:26:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/LisaMurtha-Article-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Melanie Wade\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Melanie Wade\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/\",\"name\":\"Few Legislative Proposals Do More to Decimate Women's, Children's and Parents' Rights than the Constitutional Amendment on Ohio's November Ballot - Cincinnati Right to Life\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/LisaMurtha-Article-1.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-10T17:10:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-01T18:26:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/LisaMurtha-Article-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/LisaMurtha-Article-1.png\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":600},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Few Legislative Proposals Do More to Decimate Women’s, Children’s and Parents’ Rights than the Constitutional Amendment on Ohio’s November Ballot\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/\",\"name\":\"Cincinnati Right to Life\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789\",\"name\":\"Melanie Wade\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Melanie Wade\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/author\/mwade\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Few Legislative Proposals Do More to Decimate Women's, Children's and Parents' Rights than the Constitutional Amendment on Ohio's November Ballot - Cincinnati Right to Life","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Few Legislative Proposals Do More to Decimate Women's, Children's and Parents' Rights than the Constitutional Amendment on Ohio's November Ballot - Cincinnati Right to Life","og_description":"By: Lisa Murtha Proponents of amending the Ohio constitution this November have framed it as a simple \u201creproductive rights\u201d issue. But the proposed amendment\u2019s official name – the \u201cRight to Make Reproductive Decisions Including Abortion Initiative\u201d – reveals the framers\u2019 clear attempt at legislative sleight of hand. (emphasis added) The moment the amendment\u2019s language was…","og_url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/","og_site_name":"Cincinnati Right to Life","article_published_time":"2023-09-10T17:10:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-01T18:26:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":600,"url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/LisaMurtha-Article-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Melanie Wade","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Melanie Wade","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/","url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/","name":"Few Legislative Proposals Do More to Decimate Women's, Children's and Parents' Rights than the Constitutional Amendment on Ohio's November Ballot - Cincinnati Right to Life","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/LisaMurtha-Article-1.png","datePublished":"2023-09-10T17:10:29+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-01T18:26:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/LisaMurtha-Article-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/LisaMurtha-Article-1.png","width":1200,"height":600},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/few-legislative-proposals-do-more-to-decimate-womens-childrens-and-parents-rights-than-the-constitutional-amendment-on-ohios-november-ballot\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Few Legislative Proposals Do More to Decimate Women’s, Children’s and Parents’ Rights than the Constitutional Amendment on Ohio’s November Ballot"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/","name":"Cincinnati Right to Life","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/9a5fe1347253fa134f21cdb919caf789","name":"Melanie Wade","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7ec3fd7a1977f4be962597ccc3e12001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Melanie Wade"},"url":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/author\/mwade\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29389","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29389"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29389\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29393,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29389\/revisions\/29393"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29390"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cincinnatirighttolife.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}